Author: Just Summit Editorial Team
Source: Alliance Bernstein
40 sec readExplore the same thread
Active equity investing is being tested by higher market concentration, rich valuations, and fast-changing factor leadership. In the US and other large-cap benchmarks, a narrow group of mega-cap stocks has made it harder for many active managers to add value, while passive portfolios have concentrated risk rather than removed it.
At the same time, selectivity still matters in markets with broader dispersion, such as non-US equities and emerging markets. These areas have offered stronger opportunities for skilled managers to find fundamentals that are not fully reflected in prices.
For asset owners, the message is to use active risk more intentionally instead of treating active and passive as a simple either-or choice. Strategies with clear processes, disciplined risk control, and adaptable research systems may be better positioned to deliver steadier outcomes across cycles.
The main opportunity is improved diversification and alpha potential where benchmarks are less crowded. The main risk is relying on style bets or high-conviction approaches without matching them to time horizon, tolerance for tracking error, and portfolio goals.
Source and archive